Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/55611
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGeir Agnarssonen_US
dc.contributor.authorRaymond Greenlawen_US
dc.contributor.authorSanpawat Kantabutraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-05T02:58:27Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-05T02:58:27Z-
dc.date.issued2016-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0324721Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85018819781en_US
dc.identifier.other10.14232/actacyb.22.4.2016.2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85018819781&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/55611-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we consider the structure and topology of a layered-security model in which the containers and their nestings are given in the form of a rooted tree T. A cyber-security model is an ordered three-tuple M = (T;C; P) where C and P are multisets of penetration costs for the containers and targetacquisition values for the prizes that are located within the containers, respectively, both of the same cardinality as the set of the non-root vertices of T. The problem that we study is to assign the penetration costs to the edges and the target-acquisition values to the vertices of the tree T in such a way that minimizes the total prize that an attacker can acquire given a limited budget. The attacker breaks into containers starting at the root of T and once a vertex has been broken into, its children can be broken into by paying the associated penetration costs. The attacker must deduct the corresponding penetration cost from the budget, as each new container is broken into. For a given assignment of costs and target values we obtain a security system. We show that in general it is not possible to develop an optimal security system for a given cyber-security model M. We define P- and C-models where the penetration costs and prizes, respectively, all have unit value. We show that if T is a rooted tree such that any P- or C-model M = (T;C; P) has an optimal security system, then T is one of the following types: (i) a rooted path, (ii) a rooted star, (iii) a rooted 3-caterpillar, or (iv) a rooted 4-spider. Conversely, if T is one of these four types of trees, then we show that any P- or C-model M = (T;C; P) does have an optimal security system. Finally, we study a duality between P- and C-models that allows us to translate results for P-models into corresponding results for C-models and vice versa. The results obtained give us some mathematical insights into how layered-security defenses should be organized.en_US
dc.subjectComputer Scienceen_US
dc.subjectDecision Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.subjectMathematicsen_US
dc.titleThe structure of rooted weighted trees modeling layered cyber-security systemsen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleActa Cyberneticaen_US
article.volume22en_US
article.stream.affiliationsGeorge Mason University, Fairfax Campusen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUS Naval Academyen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.