Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/55652
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorC. K. Morleyen_US
dc.contributor.authorC. W. Nixonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-05T02:59:19Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-05T02:59:19Z-
dc.date.issued2016-03-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn01918141en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84958093594en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.jsg.2016.01.005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84958093594&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/55652-
dc.description.abstract© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. 2-D, map-view topological analysis of ten natural and two analogue fault networks was undertaken. The fault arrays range from simple, low-displacement systems, to complex systems arising from multiple stages of deformation, or exhibiting complex local rotation of stresses. Classification of fault arrays was based on fault terminations (I-nodes), splaying and abutting geometries (Y-nodes) and cross-cutting relationships (X-nodes), which permit relatively quick and simple ways of analysing fault terminations and connectivity. Many of the fault networks are predominantly composed of I- and Y-nodes with at most only a minor X-node population, hence discrimination of significant differences between fault networks using just this type of analysis is limited. Subdividing Y-nodes into splaying (Ys), abutting (Ya) and cross-cutting (Yc) types, displaying the data on Ys-Ya-Yc node triangles, as well as generating equivalent networks defined by vertices and edges provides additional information for defining fault networks. Comparison of the Ys-Ya-Yc node triangle and the excess kurtosis of vertice degree distribution identifies seven distinct types of network that show meaningful differences. Such quantitative descriptions are useful for comparing the results of analogue and numerical models with natural examples as well as assessing fault network connectivity, which has implications for the structural interpretation of reservoirs and aquifers. A wide variety of factors contribute to variations in fault networks such as variations in strain, stress rotation with time, fabric inheritance, and stress deflection. While topology cannot be used to identify specific mechanisms, some topological characteristics can help narrow the likely mechanism particularly when used in conjunction with more traditional techniques and observations.en_US
dc.subjectEarth and Planetary Sciencesen_US
dc.titleTopological characteristics of simple and complex normal fault networksen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of Structural Geologyen_US
article.volume84en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversitetet i Bergenen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.