Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/55867
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTa Chih Hsiaoen_US
dc.contributor.authorYao Chuan Leeen_US
dc.contributor.authorKe Ching Chenen_US
dc.contributor.authorWei Cheng Yeen_US
dc.contributor.authorKhajornsak Sopajareeen_US
dc.contributor.authorYing I. Tsaien_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-05T03:02:44Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-05T03:02:44Z-
dc.date.issued2016-04-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn20711409en_US
dc.identifier.issn16808584en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84961911769en_US
dc.identifier.other10.4209/aaqr.2015.10.0614en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84961911769&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/55867-
dc.description.abstract© Taiwan Association for Aerosol Research. Two portable, battery powered particle size distribution analyzers, TSI NanoScan scanning mobility particle sizer (TSI NanoScan SMPS 3910, USA) and Kanomax Portable Aerosol Mobility Spectrometer (Kanomax PAMS 3300, Japan), have been recently introduced to the market. Both are compact and allow researchers to rapidly measure and monitor ambient or indoor ultrafine and nanoparticles in real time. In addition, both instruments apply the SMPS measuring scheme, utilizing a corona charger in place of a radioactive neutralizer, and are integrated with a hand-held condensation particle counter (CPC). In this study, the different designs, flow schemes, and operational settings of both instruments have been summarized based on the information released by the manufacturers and the available published literature. The performance characteristics and monitoring capability of these two portable ultrafine to nanoparticle sizers were investigated and compared to a reference TSI 3936 lab-based SMPS under identical conditions. Reasonable agreement was found between the three instruments in terms of their efficiency in sizing and counting polydispersed particles. Of the two portable analyzers, PAMS was able to provide a higher sizing resolution for monodispersed particle measurements than NanoScan, when operated under the High Mode (higher sheath to aerosol flow ratio).en_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.titleExperimental comparison of two portable and real-time size distribution analyzers for nano/submicron aerosol measurementsen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleAerosol and Air Quality Researchen_US
article.volume16en_US
article.stream.affiliationsNational Central University Taiwanen_US
article.stream.affiliationsTungnan Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChia-Nan University of Pharmacy and Science Taiwanen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.