Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/71222
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPathawee Khongkhunthianen_US
dc.contributor.authorKanoknual Jomjunyongen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeter A. Reicharten_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-27T03:33:06Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-27T03:33:06Z-
dc.date.issued2017en_US
dc.identifier.citationChiang Mai University (CMU) Journal of Natural Sciences 16,1 (Jan-Mar 2017), 51-62en_US
dc.identifier.issn2465-4337en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://cmuj.cmu.ac.th/uploads/journal_list_index/399644884.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/71222-
dc.descriptionChiang Mai University (CMU) Journal of Natural Sciences is dedicated to the publication of original research in Sciences &Technology and the Health Sciences. Submissions are welcomed from CMU, as well as other Thai and foreign institutions. All submissions must be original research not previously published or simultaneously submitted for publication. Manuscripts are peer reviewed using the double -blinded review system by at least 2 reviewers before acceptance. The CMU Journal of Natural Sciences is published four times a year, in January, April, July and October.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements using post-surgical, implant placement, CBCT images by measuring the length and width of implants on CBCT images and comparing these measurements to the actual sizes of the implants, as well as investigated critical anatomical structure injuries after using CBCT for planning. Ninety-six post-operative CBCT scans of 171 dental implants, placed between October 2012 and March 2015, were included in the study. Each implant was measured on the CBCT images for both diameter and length, using the measuring toolin the CBCT software. The measured values were compared with the actual implant diameters and lengths and calculated as a percentage of error. The mean percentage of error was 2.26%. There were no significant differences in percentage of error between implant size, implant diameters, implant positions, upper jaw, lower jaw, anterior area, or posterior area (p>0.05). Anatomical structure injuries were not found post-operatively. The accuracy of CBCT used for measurement in this study was 97.74%, and comparable to that reported for other commercial CBCT machines. The use of CBCT for implant planning can avoid anatomical structure injuries.en_US
dc.language.isoEngen_US
dc.publisherChiang Mai Universityen_US
dc.subject3D imagingen_US
dc.subjectImplant measurementen_US
dc.subjectCBCT accuracyen_US
dc.titleAccuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Dental Implant Treatment Planningen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.