Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/74801
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wipawan Chatrattanarak | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Weerapan Aunmeungtong | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Pathawee Khongkhunthian | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-16T06:50:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-16T06:50:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-08-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 17088208 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 15230899 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-85131354768 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1111/cid.13098 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85131354768&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/74801 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Aim: To compare the long-term prospective clinical outcomes in a previous randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) of 2 Mini Dental Implant (2MDI), 4 Mini Dental Implant (4MDI), and 2 Conventional Dental Implant (2CDI)-retained mandibular overdenture with follow-up between 5 to 8 years. Materials and Methods: Thirty-seven patients formerly participated in the Comparative Clinical Study of CDI and MDI for Mandibular Overdenture were requested for examination of clinical outcomes. A total of 104 implants were placed with mean follow-up periods 6.64 ± 0.60 years. In Group 1 (2MDI) and Group 2 (4MDI), implants were placed and immediately loaded with Equator® attachments to retained mandibular overdenture. In Group 3 (2CDI), implants were placed and delayed 3 months for denture loading with ball attachment. The success rate, survival rate, clinical implant performance scale (CIP scale), peri-implant tissue status, prosthetic complication, implant stability quotient (ISQ), marginal bone level change (MBLC), and patient satisfactions were analyzed. Results: After 5 to 8 years follow-up, the success rate in Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 90.91%, 93.33%, and 54.55%, respectively. The success rate in Group 3 was significantly lesser than Group 1 (p = 0.016) and Group 2 (p < 0.001). The survival rate in Groups 1, 2, and 3 was 100%, 96.67%, and 90.91%, respectively, and showed no significant differences. Mean ISQ reported no significant differences between groups. Mean MBLC were 0.57 ± 1.19 mm, 0.68 ± 0.90 mm, and 1.55 ± 1.60 mm in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Group 3 reported significantly greater mean MBLC than Group 1 (p = 0.016) and Group 2 (p = 0.011), but Groups 1 and 2 were not significantly differences. The overall patient satisfactions were reported as not significant differences between groups. Conclude: Two MDI-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loaded protocol performed had favorable clinical outcomes, cost effectiveness, and overall patient satisfactions after 5 to 8 years follow-up. | en_US |
dc.subject | Dentistry | en_US |
dc.title | Comparative clinical study of conventional dental implant and mini dental implant-retained mandibular overdenture: A 5- to 8-Year prospective clinical outcomes in a previous randomized clinical trial | en_US |
dc.type | Journal | en_US |
article.title.sourcetitle | Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research | en_US |
article.volume | 24 | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Chiang Mai University | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | CMUL: Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.