Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76198
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPermsak Paholpaken_US
dc.contributor.authorTaweechok Wisanuyotinen_US
dc.contributor.authorWinai Sirichativapeeen_US
dc.contributor.authorWilasinee Sirichativapeeen_US
dc.contributor.authorWeerachai Kosuwonen_US
dc.contributor.authorJanista Wongratanacheewinen_US
dc.contributor.authorApiruk Sangsinen_US
dc.contributor.authorYuichi Kasaien_US
dc.contributor.authorHideki Murakamien_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T07:06:25Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T07:06:25Z-
dc.date.issued2022-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn17437563en_US
dc.identifier.issn17437555en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85130312002en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1111/ajco.13778en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85130312002&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76198-
dc.description.abstractAim: To demonstrate a single posterior approach, total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) could be performed safely without preoperative embolization in spinal metastasis patients. Materials and Methods: Thirteen solitary spinal metastasis patients (five males) underwent single posterior approach TES at the thoracolumbar spine without preoperative embolization from January 2018 to January 2020. The primary sites were the breast (n = 4), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 2), colon (n = 2), and others (n = 5). All patients underwent single posterior TES. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Frankel neurological status, operative time and blood loss, and any complications were all recorded. The patients were regularly followed-up with radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging to detect any local recurrences. Results: The mean operative time was 354.6 min, and the mean operative blood loss was 2134.62 ml. None of the patients experienced any perioperative complications. Within the follow-up period (3–24 months), no local recurrences were detected. Two patients (15.38%) were found to have distant metastasis to adjacent and remote vertebrae. Three patients were lost to follow-up, and three patients died of disease. Six patients showed an improved ECOG functional status by at least one grade. Four of Frankel A patients improved their neurological status by at least one grade. Conclusion: Even without embolization, single posterior TES at the thoracolumbar spine is safe and effective for short-term local control in solitary spinal metastasis. However, TES cannot prevent distant metastasis. Longer-term follow-up studies will be able to further identify the benefits of TES for the long-term local control of diseases.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleClinical results of total en bloc spondylectomy using a single posterior approach in spinal metastasis patients: Experiences from Thailanden_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleAsia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncologyen_US
article.stream.affiliationsFaculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsFaculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsKhon Kaen Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsNagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciencesen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.